To read this content please select one of the options below:

Money pills: corporate political activity effect on mergers and acquisitions

Raul Beal Partyka (Graduate Program in Business Administration, Fundação Getulio Vargas’s Sao Paulo School of Business Administration (FGV EAESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil)
Jeferson Lana (Graduate Program in Business Administration, Univali University, Itajai, Brazil)
Rosilene Marcon (Graduate Program in Business Administration, Univali University, Itajai, Brazil)

Management Research Review

ISSN: 2040-8269

Article publication date: 14 February 2023

Issue publication date: 17 October 2023

157

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to contribute to the corporate political activities (CPAs) field by suggesting the effect of campaign contributions on the time that firms wait for regulators’ decisions.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper analyzes 358 mergers and acquisitions (M&A) from 2008 to 2017 in Brazil through ordinary least squares regression with robustness control and causal operationalization in a small vote margins treatment.

Findings

Campaign contributions speed up the M&A regulator’s decisions. Campaign contributions amounts proved to be effective in decreasing the waiting time for judgments of M&A deals. Besides, National Development Bank disbursements to companies in M&A deals, served as a moderator to help reduce the waiting time.

Research limitations/implications

The main implication of this paper to the antecedents of CPA research is the estimation of time as an output of the political efforts of firms. Previous research focuses on what firms could get. Here, the authors focus on when. As a limitation, this study analyzes CPA through campaign contributions, as the only reliable source of CPA publicly available. Firms use multiple mechanisms of CPA. It would be expected for new papers to test different CPA mechanisms, such as political connections and lobbying.

Practical implications

This study provides evidence of the use of CPA as a relevant mechanism for firms to avoid institutional risks by getting regulators’ decisions faster. This evidence is useful for firms to grant their competitive advantage in a highly volatile environment, such as an emerging market.

Social implications

What happens in the nonmarket environment interferes within markets. Businesses seek to finance political projects with which they are more aligned, and governments provide capital to businesses in exchange for political support. Whether to expand successfully may also depend on early entrants, who will have acquired enough leadership to dominate the market.

Originality/value

While most of the research on nonmarket strategy focuses on what firms can get as an output for CPA efforts, this study provides here evidence on when firms can get it. As one can cite, in business, time is money.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: This study was supported by The Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) (Grant #040/2017), Foundation within The Brazilian Ministry of Education.

Conflict of interest: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Citation

Beal Partyka, R., Lana, J. and Marcon, R. (2023), "Money pills: corporate political activity effect on mergers and acquisitions", Management Research Review, Vol. 46 No. 10, pp. 1364-1387. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2021-0834

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles