Cross-cultural conceptualization and implementation of recovery in mental health: a literature review

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to review the literature in terms of the conceptualization of the recovery concept among cultural and ethnic minorities drawing on the connectedness, hope and optimism about the future; Identity, meaning in life, empowerment (CHIME) framework; highlight the cultural adaptations of supported housing – a prominent recovery-oriented intervention, as it was implemented in a multicultural western country; and delineate the future implications for research, policy and practice in regard to mental health recovery interventions for cultural and ethnic minorities.

Design/methodology/approach

An online search was performed to identify recent empirical studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals.

Findings

Included studies confirmed what the authors of CHIME had initially reported: spirituality and support networks could act as enablers or inhibitors in the recovery process of mental health services users with diverse cultural backgrounds. The stigma surrounding mental illness is a key challenge that skews the recovery experience. Other cultural-specific factors include linguistic peculiarities of the maternal language and gender. The cultural adaptation of a recovery-oriented intervention was feasible and effective but also challenging.

Originality/value

By studying the cultural variations of mental health recovery, the intention is to inform mental health practitioners and other key stakeholders of the distinct cultural components that influence the recovery process, thereby promoting the development of culturally sensitive, accessible and effective recovery-oriented interventions. It is worth noting that providing culturally appropriate mental health services could be viewed as a human right issue for minority groups.

Citation

Sofouli, E. (2021), "Cross-cultural conceptualization and implementation of recovery in mental health: a literature review", Mental Health and Social Inclusion, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-08-2020-0057