To read this content please select one of the options below:

Uncovering the values that motivate people in relation to payments for involvement in research

Teresa Roca (Senior Lecturer in Organisation and Human Resources Management, based at Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK)
Peter Bates (Facilitator for Public Leadership, based at Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK)

Mental Health and Social Inclusion

ISSN: 2042-8308

Article publication date: 5 March 2014

123

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to response to the 2013 health and welfare reform in the UK by looking specifically at how health research stakeholders in the East Midlands perceive reimbursements for their participation in research.

Design/methodology/approach

In keeping with the government research agenda, a survey was distributed to patient and public involvement in research volunteers and other stakeholders in the East Midlands region. In total, 251 useful returns were statistically analysed using descriptive and frequency based statistics and factor analysis. Principal Component Analysis and Varimax Rotation with Kaiser Normalisation were used. This was supplemented by thematic analysis of the content of open questions.

Findings

29 per cent of respondents reported experience with payments and/or reimbursement of expenses for participation in research. Three main factors emerged from the exploratory factor analysis indicative of the values that underpin participants motivation to participate in research. These were “as an opportunity for self-development”, “volunteering”, and “work and market forces”. This revealed that local organisations were somewhat out of step with stakeholders motivations.

Research limitations/implications

It is a small study, and therefore has limited power to predict. Wider societal factors were not taken into account and may also impinge on the responses given, especially if respondents are dependent on welfare benefits and vulnerable to shifting community attitudes.

Practical implications

This study has got practical implications for policy makers, ethics committees, agencies promoting patient and public involvement, and research organisations. It should influence the design of health research, allow systems to be aligned with individual motivation, maximise recruitment to research and enhance the validity of research findings.

Social implications

Genuine coproduction will enhance the quality of health and social care research, and will be strengthened by payment systems that respond the ethical position of participants rather than simply organise around welfare benefit regulations. This study also has the potential to influence guidance from major funders of health research.

Originality/value

This study offers an unique contribution into a neglected, complex yet significant area of research practice.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire (NIHR CLAHRC NDL). The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Citation

Roca, T. and Bates, P. (2014), "Uncovering the values that motivate people in relation to payments for involvement in research", Mental Health and Social Inclusion, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-02-2014-0005

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles