To read this content please select one of the options below:

Doing and rethinking. Building resilience with men

Mark Robinson (Centre for Men’s Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom)
Steve Robertson (Centre for Men’s Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom)
Mary Steen (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Sciences Division, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia)
Gary Raine (Centre for Men’s Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom)
Rhiannon Day (School of Health and Wellbeing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom)

Mental Health Review Journal

ISSN: 1361-9322

Article publication date: 14 September 2015

370

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to present findings from an evaluation of a mental health resilience intervention for unemployed men aged 45-60. The focus is on examining the place of activities within a multi-dimensional men’s mental health programme, and exploring interactions between social context factors and models of change.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper draws on before and after survey data and qualitative interviews, to report results concerning effectiveness in changing men’s perceived resilience, to consider project processes concerning activities, social support and coping strategies, and to situate these within wider environments.

Findings

The programme significantly raised the perceived resilience of participants. Activities were engaging for men, while the complex intersection between activities, social networking, and coping strategies course provided opportunities for men to develop resilience in contexts resonant with their male identities.

Research limitations/implications

A limitation is that the evaluation could not measure longer term impacts.

Practical implications

The paper discusses emerging considerations for resilience building, focusing on gender-sensitive approaches which can engage and retain men by focusing on doing and talking, in the contexts of men’s life-course, highlighting embodied (male) identities not disembodied “mental states”, and facilitating social support. There are challenges to recruit men despite stigma, support men to speak of feelings, and facilitate progression.

Social implications

Potential exists for gender-aware programmes to sustain salutogenic change, co-producing social assets of peer support, male-friendly activities, and context sensitive course provision.

Originality/value

The paper adds fresh evidence of gendered intervention approaches, including effects on male resilience. Application of a context-sensitive change model leads to multi-component findings for transferring and sustaining programme gains.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Mind Resilience programme co-ordinator and project steering group. The authors thank the men who gave valuable time to being interviewed, and who filled in questionnaires. The authors also thank stakeholders who took part in interviews.

Citation

Robinson, M., Robertson, S., Steen, M., Raine, G. and Day, R. (2015), "Doing and rethinking. Building resilience with men", Mental Health Review Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-12-2014-0045

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles