To read this content please select one of the options below:

Is there a choice to make? A pilot study investigating attitudes towards treatment in an Early Intervention for Psychosis service

Felicity Ann Cowdrey (Cotswold House, Specialist Eating Disorder Unit, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough, UK) (Clinical Psychology Department, University of Bath, Bath, UK)
Lorna Hogg (Clinical Psychology Department, University of Bath, Bath, UK)
Kate Chapman (South Gloucestershire Early Intervention for Psychosis Service, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bristol, UK)

Mental Health Review Journal

ISSN: 1361-9322

Article publication date: 17 May 2018

Issue publication date: 30 May 2018

213

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate health care professionals’ (HCPs) and service-users’ (SUs) attitudes towards different treatment options in an Early Intervention for Psychosis (EIP) service as well as the topical issue of offering choice over treatment.

Design/methodology/approach

Seven SUs accessing an EIP service and nine HCPs completed qualitative surveys about treatment for psychosis. Data were analysed thematically.

Findings

Both HCPs and SUs appeared to have a generally positive attitude to the range of interventions offered by the EIP service and SUs talked about the importance of all treatment options being explored. There was variation in attitudes towards SUs having choice over their treatment and a number of factors were identified as crucial in influencing attitudes including mental capacity, risk and level of engagement.

Research limitations/implications

Small sample size, recruitment from only one EIP service and using a survey design limit generalisability and depth of analysis.

Practical implications

HCPs working in EIP services should explore different treatment options fully with SUs but be aware that they may feel unable to make the decision themselves. Such discussions should be revisited throughout an individual’s care as their ability and desire to make informed choices may change over time. Continuing Professional Development and clinical supervision should be used to help HCPs reflect on the choice agenda and the implications of this for clinical practice.

Originality/value

Few studies have examined attitudes towards treatments for psychosis. This is an evolving and important clinical area that remains under researched. Recommendations for service-development, future research and clinical practice are made.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors report no conflicts of interest. No external funding was received for this study. The authors are grateful to the service-users and staff who completed the survey.

Citation

Cowdrey, F.A., Hogg, L. and Chapman, K. (2018), "Is there a choice to make? A pilot study investigating attitudes towards treatment in an Early Intervention for Psychosis service", Mental Health Review Journal, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-09-2017-0038

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles