To read this content please select one of the options below:

Determinants of acquirer-target distance in M & A

Tae-Nyun Kim (Department of Finance, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey, USA)
Bumseok Chun (Urban Planning and Environmental Policy, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas, USA)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 8 February 2016

460

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to propose several potential determinants of the distance between acquirer and target in M & A deals and examine the negative impact of the acquirer-target distance on announcement returns of acquiring firms.

Design/methodology/approach

By employing two-stage regression model, the authors control for the potential endogeneity of acquirer-target distance. The authors use excess distance instead of raw distance between acquirer and target to look at the impact of acquirer-target distance on announcement returns.

Findings

The authors find that acquirer-target distance in M & A tends to be longer when major hub airports are located closer to acquiring and target firms, target firm is located in a region with higher level of unemployment rate and median household income, and target firm is smaller and has more cash holdings. When controlling for the potential determinants of acquirer-target distance, including the level of targets information asymmetry, the authors still find that the excess distance between acquirer and target has a negative impact on announcement returns of acquiring firms.

Originality/value

This study provides three main contributions to the literature. First, the authors find that acquirer-target distance in M & A is not exogenous and determined by several firm characteristics and regional economic factors. Second, the authors show that the acquirer-target distance has a negative impact on announcement returns even when controlling for the potential determinants. Third, by including information asymmetry measures as potential determinants of acquirer-target distance, the authors show that information advantage of local bidders may not be the most critical factor for their higher returns compared to the bidders from remote areas.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

JEL Classification — G30, G34, R10

The authors are grateful for the comments and suggestions by Editor Don Johnson, two anonymous referees, and participants at 2014 SWFA annual meeting in Dallas, TX. All errors remain the author’s responsibility.

Citation

Kim, T.-N. and Chun, B. (2016), "Determinants of acquirer-target distance in M & A", Managerial Finance, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2014-0220

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles