To read this content please select one of the options below:

What drives the premium labour model, beta instability risk or human capital? Evidence for the UK

Mona Soufian (Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK)
David McMillan (Accounting and Finance Division, Stirling University, Stirling, UK)
Stuart Horsburgh (Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, Manchester, UK)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 14 October 2013

561

Abstract

Purpose

The paper examines the conditional capital asset pricing model (CCAPM) of Jagannathan and Wang using the UK data and develops a data-driven measure of beta instability risk that is pertinent to the UK stock market. In contrast to the view that the main part of the Jagannathan and Wang's model is the inclusion of human capital, however, the paper finds that human capital remains insignificant in most tests.

Design/methodology/approach

Data were taken from the London Share Price Database and Datastream. This paper therefore examines the premium labour (PL) model of Jagannathan and Wang using the UK data, while the paper attaches particular importance to the measure of beta instability as a source of time variation in betas. In analysing the measure of beta instability risk, this study considers a testable measure of instability risk that varies across markets and across time as the interaction between the stock market and the economy varies across different time periods. Hence, this paper develops a data-driven measure of beta instability risk that is pertinent to the UK stock market.

Findings

The results confirm the premium version of the model, that is, the CCAPM without a proxy for human capital. In particular, the paper finds that over the entire time period of this study, the measure for beta instability risk and market portfolio has significant explanatory power for the variations of returns. More specifically, when using the average earnings index as a proxy for human capital in the PL model, the premium model performs better than the PL model. When total income from employment is used as a proxy for human capital, the performance of the PL model improves for the full period. However, the results for the two sub-periods are less favourable for the PL model as, again, labour income is not priced for these periods. These results indicate that the PL model is sensitive to proxies used for human capital.

Originality/value

The results revive the importance of beta instability risk in CCAPM of Jagannathan and Wang's model and suggest that the beta instability drives this model.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

JEL classification – G12The authors are grateful for the insights provided by Professor Ian Garrett, School of Accounting and Finance, Manchester Business School, UK and for the helpful comments of Professor Jonathan Fletcher, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Strathclyde, UK on an earlier draft of this paper.

Citation

Soufian, M., McMillan, D. and Horsburgh, S. (2013), "What drives the premium labour model, beta instability risk or human capital? Evidence for the UK", Managerial Finance, Vol. 39 No. 12, pp. 1188-1200. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2012-0135

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles