To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Is offense worth more than defense and pitching? Marginal revenue product and revenue sharing in major league baseball

Justin Andrew Ehrlich (Department of Sports Management, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
Joel M. Potter (Department of Finance and Economics, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, Georgia, USA)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 4 July 2020

Issue publication date: 3 June 2021

193

Abstract

Purpose

Sports economists have consistently found that winning positively impacts team revenue fans prefer to allocate their entertainment dollars to winning teams. Previous research has also found that fans do not have a preference for how their team wins. However, this research ignores the significant variability in revenue that can exist between teams with similar attendance figures. The authors contribute to the literature by testing whether profit maximizing teams should pay different amounts for different types of production by estimating the marginal revenue product of a win due to offense, defense and pitching.

Design/methodology/approach

Using data from the 2010–2017 Major League Baseball seasons and an Ordinary Least Squares-Fixed Effects approach, the authors test whether a unit of offensive, defensive and pitching production generates differing amounts of team revenue both before and after revenue sharing. The authors then test if team Wins Above Replacement is a good approximation of actual wins while accounting for the previously observed nonlinear relationship between wins and revenue.

Findings

The authors found that marginal revenue product estimates in the postrevenue sharing model for mowar, pwar and dwar are nearly identical to each other. Further, after predicting prerevenue sharing, the authors find that fans have no preference for mowar, pwar or dwar play styles.

Originality/value

The findings illustrate that team decision-makers appear to be acting irrationally by paying more for offense than they do for defense. Thus, the findings suggest that team decision-makers should value defensive wins and pitching wins at the same rate as offensive wins on the free agent market.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Lara J. Potter for her thorough proofreading and incisive editing. Her contributions led to a much more readable manuscript. The authors would also like to thank her for proofreading this acknowledgment.

Citation

Ehrlich, J.A. and Potter, J.M. (2021), "Is offense worth more than defense and pitching? Marginal revenue product and revenue sharing in major league baseball", Managerial Finance, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 760-778. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-04-2020-0210

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles