To read this content please select one of the options below:

Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence

Patrick S.W. Fong (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong)
Chenghao Men (Tongji University, Shanghai, China)
Jinlian Luo (Tongji University, Shanghai, China)
Ruiqian Jia (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China)

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747

Article publication date: 31 January 2018

Issue publication date: 20 February 2018

3849

Abstract

Purpose

Creativity and innovation are crucial in improving the organizational performance and sustaining competitive advantage. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between knowledge hiding and team creativity.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors tested the hypotheses with a sample of 87 knowledge worker teams involving 393 employees and employers in China.

Findings

Knowledge hiding is negatively related to team creativity, fully mediated by absorptive capacity. In addition, the negative relationship between knowledge hiding and absorptive capacity would be weakened by task interdependence.

Practical implications

Team managers should take measures to avoid the development of knowledge hiding, which is indirectly related to team creativity via absorptive capacity within a team, and motivate team members to share more knowledge by training to improve their feelings of accountability, responsibility, and duty. In addition, managers can decrease knowledge hiding by strengthening within-team task interdependence.

Originality/value

This study is one of the first to investigate the relationship between knowledge hiding and team creativity and the moderating role of task interdependence in the relationship between knowledge hiding and absorptive capacity.

Keywords

Citation

Fong, P.S.W., Men, C., Luo, J. and Jia, R. (2018), "Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence", Management Decision, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2016-0778

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles