TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework for the analysis of students’ ratings of teaching quality in higher education and the disclosure of risky issues undermining the quality of teaching and courses that require attention for continuous improvement. The framework integrates two decision-based methods: the standardized u-control chart and the ABC analysis using fuzzy weights. The control chart, using the students’ ratings, allows the identification of those courses requiring an improvement of teaching quality in the short-medium term. While the ABC analysis uses fuzzy weights to deal with the vagueness and uncertainty of students’ teaching evaluations and provides a risk map of the potential areas of teaching performances improvement in the long term. The proposed framework allows the identification of teaching and course quality aspects that need corrective actions in response to students’ criticisms in accordance with different levels of priority.Design/methodology/approach This study adopts two methods, commonly used in industrial applications, i.e. the u-control chart and ABC analysis. Combining the results of a literature review on teaching evaluation and the application of these two methods as building blocks for the assessment, a framework to detect potential risks reducing teaching quality in higher education is proposed. The application of the framework is shown through an action-based case study developed in an Italian public university.Findings The study proposes a framework that combines two methods, i.e. u-control chart and ABC analysis with fuzzy weights, to support the assessment of teaching and course quality. The framework is proposed as an assessment approach of the teaching performance in higher education with the purpose to continuously improve the quality of teaching and courses both in the short, medium and long term.Originality/value The study provides an original contribution to the understanding of how to analyze students’ evaluation of teaching performance in order to take proper and timely decisions on corrective actions in response to the need of continuously improving the level of teaching and course quality.
VL  - 57
IS  - 2
SN  - 0025-1747
DO  - 10.1108/MD-04-2018-0488
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2018-0488
AU  - Carlucci Daniela
AU  - Renna Paolo
AU  - Izzo Carmen
AU  - Schiuma Giovanni
PY  - 2018
Y1  - 2018/01/01
TI  - Assessing teaching performance in higher education: a framework for continuous improvement
T2  - Management Decision
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 461
EP  - 479
Y2  - 2024/04/18
ER  -