To read this content please select one of the options below:

Directorate ties: a bibliometric analysis

Rosa Caiazza (Department of Management, Parthenope University of Naples, Naples, Italy)
Michele Simoni (DISAQ, Parthenope University of Naples, Naples, Italy)

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747

Article publication date: 27 August 2019

Issue publication date: 30 October 2019

605

Abstract

Purpose

Over the last 100 years, research on interlocking directorates has proliferated. The purpose of this paper is to realize a bibliometric analysis of articles on interlocking directorates to identify the evolutionary patterns that characterize the studies on board interlocks.

Design/methodology/approach

A bibliometric analysis of articles on interlocking directorates published since 1914 was realized to evidence how research has evolved over time. Papers were classified according to the research topic, the type of article and the use of different theories to explain board interlocks’ causes and effects.

Findings

The authors identified four different periods that characterize board interlocks studies: the emerging debate, the earliest modern era, the modern era and the post-modern era.

Originality/value

This bibliometric analysis assesses the extant literature by highlighting emerging trends and identifying several avenues for future research.

Keywords

Citation

Caiazza, R. and Simoni, M. (2019), "Directorate ties: a bibliometric analysis", Management Decision, Vol. 57 No. 10, pp. 2837-2851. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2018-0085

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles