Emerald logo
Advanced search

Auditor industry specialization and corporate risk-taking

Jamie L. Hoelscher (Department of Accounting, Southern Illinois University – Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois, USA)
Scott E. Seavey (Department of Accounting, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Publication date: 1 July 2014

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of higher-quality auditors on corporate risk-taking.

Design/methodology/approach

Agency theory suggests that managers have incentives to avoid risk in the interests of perquisite consumption and self-preservation, while investors prefer that managers invest in all projects with a positive net present value, i.e. projects that generally increase corporate risk. Empirical literature finds that managerial risk-aversion is mitigated (and firm value enhanced) when investor protection is higher. The authors examine whether higher-quality auditing is one such mechanism to encourage shareholder-focused corporate risk-taking. They model measures of corporate risk as a function of whether a firm is audited by an industry specialist or not, controlling specifically for accounting quality. They then examine the incremental effect of higher-quality audits on other forms of external monitoring (analyst coverage and institutional holdings) for corporate risk.

Findings

Using a sample from 2003 to 2007, the authors document a positive relationship between local-level audit industry specialization and both the standard deviation of annual stock returns and research and development expenditures (their measures of corporate risk-taking). They then find the effect is mitigated when firms have alternative external monitoring, in the form of either higher analyst coverage or greater institutional holdings.

Research limitations/implications

Given the nature of the question the authors ask, particularly in the context of the auditor–client relationship, a potential limitation is the difficulty in assigning causation. Nonetheless, this study underscores the importance of auditors as an effective mechanism for monitoring corporate managers.

Originality/value

This study provides novel evidence that auditors affect managerial decision making beyond a simple effect on financial statements, and should be of interest to boards of directors, regulators and investors.

Keywords

  • Monitoring
  • Audit
  • Corporate risk
  • Industry specialists
  • M42, G32

Acknowledgements

This manuscript benefited from participants at the 2012 American Accounting Association Annual Meeting and workshop participants at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln. The authors also acknowledge the helpful comments of David Smith, Paul Tanyi, Linda Ruchala and Kathleen Farrell.

Citation

L. Hoelscher, J. and E. Seavey, S. (2014), "Auditor industry specialization and corporate risk-taking", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 596-620. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2014-1000

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication Sitemap

Policies and information

  • Legal Opens in new window
  • Editorial policy Opens in new window & originality guidelines Opens in new window
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald’s Library Advisory Network?

    You can start or join in a discussion here.
    If you’d like to know more about The Network, please email us

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Frequently Asked Questions

    Your questions answered here