2013 Awards for Excellence

Library Review

ISSN: 0024-2535

Article publication date: 2 May 2014

99

Citation

(2014), "2013 Awards for Excellence", Library Review, Vol. 63 No. 1/2. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2014-001

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited


2013 Awards for Excellence

Article Type: 2013 Awards for Excellence From: Library Review, Volume 63, Issue 1/2

The following article was selected for this year's Outstanding Paper Award for Library Review

Big deal and long tail: e-journal usage and subscriptions

Joachim Schöpfel
Department of Information and Document Science, University of Lille 3, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France

Claire Leduc
ISCID, International Business Institute, University of the Littoral and Cote d'Opale, Dunkirk, France

Purpose This paper is aimed primarily at academic library managers and acquisition librarians. By analogy to Pareto studying the relationship between clients and turnover, the paper will study subscriptions to e-journals and usage statistics. The aim is to evaluate the long tail of usage statistics and to compare it with subscription lists of individually selected titles and packages (big deals).

Design/methodology/approach The paper exploits usage statistics and subscription data from a national usage study of an academic publisher. Data are from 2010.

Findings Usage statistics are partly shaped by the long tail effect. Individual subscriptions of journals are more selective than big deals, and trend towards a traditional retail curve. Unlike subscriptions through packages, usage and individual subscriptions can be related by a similar inclination. But, both types of subscriptions fail to predict the popularity of a title in its usage.

Research limitations/implications The paper uses data from a national usage study and tries to identify global trends. Thus, it does not distinguish between customer categories, disciplines or activity domains.

Practical implications The paper considers the opportunity provided by big deals for acquisition policy. Ready-made big deals sometimes appear as an unbounded and excessive supply, not suited to true and sufficient users’ needs, but on the other hand, selective acquisition policy cannot completely anticipate online usage behaviour.

Originality/value Only a few studies distinguish Pareto from long tail distributions in usage statistics, and there is little empirical evidence on the impact of selected subscriptions versus big deals on these statistics.

Keywords Academic publishing; Acquisition policy; Big deals; Business model; E-journals; Electronic publishing; Long tail; Periodical subscriptions; Subscriptions; Usage statistics

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00242531211288245

This article originally appeared in Volume 61 Number 7, 2012, pp. 497-510

The following articles were selected for this year's Highly Commended Award

Plugging the “whole”: librarians as interdisciplinary facilitators

Jeffrey A. Knapp

This article originally appeared in Volume 61 Number 3, 2012

Pinning down a novel: characteristics of literary works as perceived by readers

Alenka Šauperl

This article originally appeared in Volume 61 Number 4, 2012

Baby boomers, their elders and the public library

Mary F. Cavanagh, Wendy Robbins

This article originally appeared in Volume 61 Number 8/9, 2012

Related articles