To read this content please select one of the options below:

Contrasting the nature and effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership

Jennifer L. Robertson (Department of Management and Organizational Studies, Western University, London, Canada)
Julian Barling (Smith School of Business, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada)

Leadership & Organization Development Journal

ISSN: 0143-7739

Article publication date: 6 March 2017

1783

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to report findings from two studies that compare the nature (construct validity) and relative effects (incremental predictive validity) of environmentally specific transformational leadership (ETFL) to general transformational leadership.

Design/methodology/approach

The nature of ETFL was investigated in an empirical study based on a sample of 185 employees. The relative effects of ETFL were examined in an experimental study based on a sample of 155 university students.

Findings

A confirmatory factor analysis showed that environmentally specific and general transformational leadership are empirically distinct but related. Findings from the experimental study revealed that compared to general transformational leadership and a control condition, participants exposed to ETFL he confederate leader’s environmental values and priorities more highly and engaged in higher levels of pro-environmental behaviors.

Research limitations/implications

Questions concerning ecological and external validity arise out of the experimental study. Future research should contrast the relative effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership across various organizational and cultural conditions. Limitations associated with demand characteristics are also of concern in the experimental study. Future research should include an environmental focus in the control condition to exclude any possible threats related to demand characteristics.

Practical implications

Results from these two studies provide useful information regarding within-organization environmental leadership training by suggesting that maximal individual and organizational environmental change may best be achieved by training leaders to be as specific as possible regarding their values, priorities and goals.

Social implications

This research suggests that leaders should engage in ETFL behaviors to have the greatest positive impact on corporate environmental sustainability, and by extension, climate change.

Originality/value

In two separate studies, the construct and incremental predictive validity of ETFL were assessed.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Amy Akers, Laurence Ashworth, Alyson Byrne, Erica Carleton, Bill Cooper, Angela Dionisi and Tara MacDonald for their contributions to this research. This research was funded by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Citation

Robertson, J.L. and Barling, J. (2017), "Contrasting the nature and effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 22-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2015-0100

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles