TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine deliberation in the context of organizational change and introduce an organizational jury as a change facilitator.Design/methodology/approach The research is based on an empirical study of four organizational juries that were organized by a non-profit organization in Finland. The main data of the study consist of a survey that the juries’ participants filled in. The data are triangulated with observations of jury meetings and relevant documents including pre-jury information package, jury presentations and juries’ proposals. In the analysis, the paper adopts deliberative democracy criteria to assess the inclusiveness, authenticity and consequentiality of the deliberative process.Findings The research findings suggest that the juries increased the inclusiveness of decision making and the quality of deliberation about the changes among the employees. The results indicate that juries facilitated the change process by providing a means for information sharing and building a shared understanding among the stakeholders. The main weakness of the juries was their low consequentiality.Originality/value Deliberative jury method provides a participative way to build and preserve socially shared meanings in an organizational change context. However, the studies on the use of deliberative forums in the organizational context are still scarce. Thus, the study provides an important addition to the existing research literature.
VL  - 40
IS  - 7
SN  - 0143-7739
DO  - 10.1108/LODJ-02-2019-0066
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2019-0066
AU  - Värttö Mikko
PY  - 2019
Y1  - 2019/01/01
TI  - Democratization of organizational change process through deliberation
T2  - Leadership & Organization Development Journal
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 791
EP  - 802
Y2  - 2024/09/23
ER  -