To read this content please select one of the options below:

Can complexity science inform physician leadership development?

Colleen Marie Grady (Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada)

Leadership in Health Services

ISSN: 1751-1879

Article publication date: 4 July 2016

795

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to describe research that examined physician leadership development using complexity science principles.

Design/methodology/approach

Intensive interviewing of 21 participants and document review provided data regarding physician leadership development in health-care organizations using five principles of complexity science (connectivity, interdependence, feedback, exploration-of-the-space-of-possibilities and co-evolution), which were grouped in three areas of inquiry (relationships between agents, patterns of behaviour and enabling functions).

Findings

Physician leaders are viewed as critical in the transformation of healthcare and in improving patient outcomes, and yet significant challenges exist that limit their development. Leadership in health care continues to be associated with traditional, linear models, which are incongruent with the behaviour of a complex system, such as health care. Physician leadership development remains a low priority for most health-care organizations, although physicians admit to being limited in their capacity to lead. This research was based on five principles of complexity science and used grounded theory methodology to understand how the behaviours of a complex system can provide data regarding leadership development for physicians. The study demonstrated that there is a strong association between physician leadership and patient outcomes and that organizations play a primary role in supporting the development of physician leaders. Findings indicate that a physician’s relationship with their patient and their capacity for innovation can be extended as catalytic behaviours in a complex system. The findings also identified limiting factors that impact physicians who choose to lead, such as reimbursement models that do not place value on leadership and medical education that provides minimal opportunity for leadership skill development.

Practical Implications

This research provides practical applications for physician leadership development and emphasizes that it is incumbent upon physicians and organizations to focus attention on this to achieve improved patient and organizational outcomes.

Originality/value

This study pairing complexity science and physician leadership represents a unique way to view the development of physician leaders within the context of the complex system that is health care.

Keywords

Citation

Grady, C.M. (2016), "Can complexity science inform physician leadership development?", Leadership in Health Services, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-12-2015-0042

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles