Paradigm versus praxis

Nizami Lance (Independent Research Scholar, Palo Alto, California, USA)

Kybernetes

ISSN: 0368-492X

Publication date: 11 November 2013

Abstract

Purpose

A key cybernetics concept, information transmitted in a system, was quantified by Shannon. It quickly gained prominence, inspiring a version by Harvard psychologists Garner and Hake for “absolute identification” experiments. There, human subjects “categorize” sensory stimuli, affording “information transmitted” in perception. The Garner-Hake formulation has been in continuous use for 62 years, exerting enormous influence. But some experienced theorists and reviewers have criticized it as uninformative. They could not explain why, and were ignored. Here, the “why” is answered. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

Design/methodology/approach

A key Shannon data-organizing tool is the confusion matrix. Its columns and rows are, respectively, labeled by “symbol sent” (event) and “symbol received” (outcome), such that matrix entries represent how often outcomes actually corresponded to events. Garner and Hake made their own version of the matrix, which deserves scrutiny, and is minutely examined here.

Findings

The Garner-Hake confusion-matrix columns represent “stimulus categories”, ranges of some physical stimulus attribute (usually intensity), and its rows represent “response categories” of the subject's identification of the attribute. The matrix entries thus show how often an identification empirically corresponds to an intensity, such that “outcomes” and “events” differ in kind (unlike Shannon's). Obtaining a true “information transmitted” therefore requires stimulus categorizations to be converted to hypothetical evoking stimuli, achievable (in principle) by relating categorization to sensation to intensity. But those relations are actually unknown, perhaps unknowable.

Originality/value

The author achieves an important understanding: why “absolute identification” experiments do not illuminate sensory processes.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The Editors, Drs Ranulph Glanville and Dai Griffiths, and the two anonymous reviewers contributed many insights, as did Prof. Claire S. Barnes PhD (VA Palo Alto HCS).

Citation

Nizami, L. (2013), "Paradigm versus praxis", Kybernetes, Vol. 42 No. 9/10, pp. 1447-1456. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2012-0059

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.