To read this content please select one of the options below:

Customer value cocreation activities: An exploration of psychological drivers and quality of life outcomes

Tram-Anh N. Pham (UWA Business School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia) (School of Industrial Management, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, VNU-HCM, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)
Jillian C. Sweeney (UWA Business School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia)
Geoffrey N. Soutar (UWA Business School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia)

Journal of Service Theory and Practice

ISSN: 2055-6225

Article publication date: 28 August 2019

Issue publication date: 20 September 2019

1173

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to suggest a typology of customer value cocreation activities and explore the psychological drivers and quality of life outcomes of such activities in a complex health care service setting.

Design/methodology/approach

Focus groups with people with Type 2 diabetes and in-depth interviews with diabetes educators were conducted.

Findings

Four types of customer value cocreation activities were found (mandatory (customer), mandatory (customer or organization), voluntary in-role and voluntary extra-role activities). In addition, health locus of control, self-efficacy, optimism, regulatory focus and expected benefits are identified as key psychological factors underlying the customers’ motivation to be active resource integrators and resulting in physical, psychological, existential and social well-being.

Originality/value

The study highlights the various types of customer value cocreation activities and how these affect the various quality of life dimensions.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship at The University of Western Australia to the lead author.

Citation

Pham, T.-A.N., Sweeney, J.C. and Soutar, G.N. (2019), "Customer value cocreation activities: An exploration of psychological drivers and quality of life outcomes", Journal of Service Theory and Practice, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 282-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-07-2018-0163

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles