To read this content please select one of the options below:

The doer effect of failure and recovery in multi-agent cases: service supply chain perspective

Cansu Yildirim (Department of Maritime Business Administration, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey)
Bengu Sevil Oflaç (Department of Logistics Management, Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey)
Oznur Yurt (Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Roehampton Business School, University of Roehampton, London, UK)

Journal of Service Theory and Practice

ISSN: 2055-6225

Article publication date: 30 January 2018

Issue publication date: 10 May 2018




The purpose of this paper is to explore the doer effect of service failure (SF), good prior experience (GPE) and recovery on overall customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions for multi-agents in tourism service supply chain (TSSC). It specifically focuses on internal and external failure and recovery.


The study employs a 2×2×3 between-subjects experimental design with 12 diverse scenarios. It aims to examine the main effects of GPE and the interaction effects of SF and recovery on overall customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions.


The main findings show that consumers do not show favorable behavioral outcomes when they have GPE with an affiliated party. Results of the experiments demonstrate that for hotels, there is no interaction effect between failure and recovery regarding overall customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions; however, for travel agencies, an interaction effect has been found. This indicates that an internal failure (by travel agency) should be recovered internally to increase the behavioral outcomes for travel agency. However, if there is an external failure (by hotel) then the essential thing is providing a recovery.


Although the service literature covers failure and recovery in diverse contexts, these concepts are rarely studied from a multi-agent perspective in the service supply chain literature. In such a chain, a failure by a different party may remain unresolved, and this may create a positive effect on another party, if they provide recovery for the failure. This means that the doer of the failure and/or recovery (the party responsible from the failure and/or recovery) may have an impact on behavioral outcomes. However, previous literature has neglected to focus on the important issue of which entity/party performs the failure and/or recovery, and the effect on behavioral outcomes. By focusing on a principal-agent relationship in a TSSC, the study aims to address this research gap.



Yildirim, C., Sevil Oflaç, B. and Yurt, O. (2018), "The doer effect of failure and recovery in multi-agent cases: service supply chain perspective", Journal of Service Theory and Practice, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 274-297.



Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles