Family firms and corporate social responsibility: exploring “concerns”

Abstract

Purpose

Scholars are devoting increasing attention to understanding a specific type of strategic initiative in family firms: corporate social responsibility (CSR). Prior studies have focused on the strengths of family firms’ CSR performance. However, to more fully understand family firms and their engagement in CSR, a granular approach is needed that teases apart the strengths and concerns of CSR performance and examines the specific dimensions that comprise CSR performance. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to theorize about six negative (i.e. concern-oriented) dimensions of family firms’ CSR performance.

Design/methodology/approach

To examine the interrelationship between a firm’s percentage of family ownership and its CSR concerns, a sample of 71 public firms from Fortune 500 companies was constructed. The sample includes 13 years of firm-level data spanning 1994-2006 and represents over 600 firm-year observations.

Findings

As predicted, a higher percentage of family owners’ equity is positively related to diversity-oriented CSR concerns and negatively related to employee relations and environmental CSR concerns. However, the percentage of equity owned by family members is not associated with community, product quality and safety, and corporate governance CSR concerns.

Originality/value

The paper addresses substantive omissions in existing research on the influence of family ownership on CSR performance.

Citation

Lamb, N.H., Butler, F. and Roundy, P. (2017), "Family firms and corporate social responsibility: exploring “concerns”", Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 469-487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2016-0010