To read this content please select one of the options below:

Experimental determination of the residual compressive strength of concrete columns subjected to different fire durations and load ratios

Anjaly Nair (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada)
Osama (Sam) Salem (Department of Civil Engineering, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada)

Journal of Structural Fire Engineering

ISSN: 2040-2317

Article publication date: 27 July 2020

Issue publication date: 10 October 2020

187

Abstract

Purpose

At elevated temperatures, concrete undergoes changes in its mechanical and thermal properties, which mainly cause degradation of strength and eventually may lead to the failure of the structure. Retrofitting is a desirable option to rehabilitate fire damaged concrete structures. However, to ensure safe reuse of fire-exposed buildings and to adopt proper retrofitting methods, it is essential to evaluate the residual load-bearing capacity of such fire-damaged reinforced concrete structures. The focus of the experimental study presented in this paper aims to investigate the fire performance of concrete columns exposed to a standard fire, and then evaluate its residual compressive strengths after fire exposure of different durations.

Design/methodology/approach

To effectively study the fire performance of such columns, eight identical 200 × 200 × 1,500-mm high reinforced concrete columns test specimens were subjected to two different fire exposure (1- and 2-h) while being loaded with two different load ratios (20% and 40% of the column ultimate design axial compressive load). In a subsequent stage and after complete cooling down, residual compressive strength capacity tests were performed on each fire exposed column.

Findings

Experimental results revealed that the columns never regain its original capacity after being subjected to a standard fire and that the residual compressive strength capacity dropped to almost 50% and 30% of its ambient temperature capacity for the columns exposed to 1- and 2-h fire durations, respectively. It was also noticed that, for the tested columns, the applied load ratio has much less effect on the column’s residual compressive strength compared to that of the fire duration.

Originality/value

According to the unique outcomes of this experimental study and, as the fire-damaged concrete columns possessed considerable residual compressive strength, in particular those exposed to shorter fire duration, it is anticipated that with proper retrofitting techniques such as fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) wrapping, the fire-damaged columns can be rehabilitated to regain at least portion of its lost load-bearing capacities. Accordingly, the residual compressive resistance data obtained from this study can be effectively used but not directly to adopt optimal retrofitting strategies for such fire-damaged concrete columns, as well as to be used in validating numerical models that can be usefully used to account for the thermally-induced degradation of the mechanical properties of concrete material and ultimately predict the residual compressive strengths and deformations of concrete columns subjected to different load intensity ratios for various fire durations.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research project was funded using a NSERC-Discovery Grant awarded to the second author. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring parties.

The authors would like to thank Harris Rebars Company (Thunder Bay branch) for its in-kind contribution and providing the steel bars required for all test specimens. Thanks is also extended to Mr C. Hubbard for his kind assistance during the preparation and testing of all specimens at both Lakehead University’s Structures Laboratory and Fire Testing and Research Laboratory (LUFTRL).

Citation

Nair, A. and Salem, O.(S). (2020), "Experimental determination of the residual compressive strength of concrete columns subjected to different fire durations and load ratios", Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 529-543. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-10-2019-0034

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles