Credit market models and the microstructure theory of the ratings market suggest that information provided by credit rating agencies becomes more relevant in recessions when agency costs are high and less relevant in expansions when agency costs are low. The purpose of this paper is to empirically test these hypotheses with regard to equity markets.
The authors use business cycle identification algorithms to map rating events (credit rating changes and watchlist inclusions) to business cycle phases and apply the event study methodology. The results are backed by cross-sectional regressions using a variety of control variables.
The authors find that the relevance of information provided by credit rating agencies for equity prices heavily depends on the level of agency costs. Furthermore, the authors detect a “flight-to-quality” during recessions in the speculative grade segment and a weakened relevance of rating events in expansions in the investment grade segment.
This paper is the first to empirically analyse how equity investors perceive credit rating changes and watchlist inclusions over the business cycle. In the empirical analysis, the authors use a large sample of about 25,000 rating events in all Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development markets. The presented results underline that credit ratings address the agency problem in financial markets and can thus be regarded as useful for risk management or regulation.
This research was conducted while Fieberg and Mertens were lecturers at the FOM Hochschule. The authors wish to thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments.
Fieberg, C., Mertens, R. and Poddig, T. (2016), "The relevance of credit ratings over the business cycle", Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-08-2015-0079Download as .RIS
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited