To read this content please select one of the options below:

(Un)earthly governance: beyond functional frameworks to flourishing spacescapes

Clare M. Mouat (Department of Geography and Planning, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia and International Space Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia)
Erika Jane Edith Techera (UWA Law School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia and International Space Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia)
Lies Notebaert (School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia and International Space Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia)
Meredith Blake (UWA Law School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia and International Space Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia)
Renae Barker (UWA Law School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia)

Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law

ISSN: 2514-9407

Article publication date: 3 August 2021

Issue publication date: 17 August 2021

108

Abstract

Purpose

Humanity has a weakness in how we approach the “challenge” of using outer space. This paper aims to show how the global and national frameworks that address our planetary activities and crises are inadequate for the opportunities and challenges of life in outer space.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors draw on multidisciplinary perspectives to refine an organising governance framework that better showcases the challenges and pathways needed for living and thriving in space-age. The authors prioritise two key pillars and overview the practical and social implications that space-age humanity must address.

Findings

Social sciences and humanities are vital to problematising post-war colonial legacies of governance by distinguishing the unique and overlooked challenges for thriving and working offworld and identifying progressive research agendas.

Research limitations/implications

The highlighted agenda has implications for collaborative research institutes and project design. As the vital basis for continuous learning, university-based research institutes span bodies of knowledge, experience, convention and imagination that can support vibrant and overdue debate on good governance that is out of this world.

Practical implications

This expansive approach has practical implications for the decision-making processes and subjects of spacescape, from reconciling the space commons with prospecting and human occupation to potential governance regimes that capitalise on the zeal for moving beyond merely “existing” off-world.

Social implications

Examining the governance deficit as we pursue developing spacescape frontiers is an enriching (not reductionist) agenda that deliberately troubles the existing and emerging regime for governing our scientific and imagined off-world society.

Originality/value

This framework appeals to humanity’s highest evolution in co-producing a fair and flourishing off-world governance framework (beyond replicating planetary regimes).

Keywords

Citation

Mouat, C.M., Techera, E.J.E., Notebaert, L., Blake, M. and Barker, R. (2021), "(Un)earthly governance: beyond functional frameworks to flourishing spacescapes", Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-02-2021-0015

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles