Emerald logo
Advanced search

High and low levels of positive mental health: are there socioeconomic differences among adolescents?

Line Nielsen (National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark)
Sarah Stewart-Brown (Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK)
Mathilde Vinther-Larsen (National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark)
Charlotte Meilstrup (National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark)
Bjørn E. Holstein (National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark)
Vibeke Koushede (National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark)

Journal of Public Mental Health

ISSN: 1746-5729

Publication date: 21 March 2016

Abstract

Purpose

It is important within public health goals to promote adolescents’ mental health and to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in mental health. Among adults there are indications that the socioeconomic pattern of low positive mental health (PMH) differs from the socioeconomic pattern of high PMH. Knowledge regarding the social epidemiology of PMH among young people is lacking. The purpose of this paper is to examine the socioeconomic patterning of aspects of low and high PMH among adolescents.

Design/methodology/approach

The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Methodology Development Study 2012 provided data on 3,670 adolescents aged 11-15 in two municipalities in Denmark. Socioeconomic differences in aspects of low and high PMH (self-esteem, social competence and self-efficacy) were investigated by calculating sex-specific prevalence of PMH in socioeconomic groups measured by parents’ occupational social class. Using multi-level logistic regression analyses, odds ratios for low and high PMH compared to moderate PMH were estimated.

Findings

In age-adjusted analyses there seemed to be a graded relationship with increasing odds for low PMH with decreasing socioeconomic position, but no indication of a socioeconomic patterning of high PMH. The prevalence of high self-esteem and high self-efficacy was higher among boys than girls. High social competence and high self-efficacy increased with age.

Research limitations/implications

Public health research has primarily focused on risk factors and mental health problems. Research highlighting more detailed aspects of PMH is needed.

Originality/value

The socioeconomic pattern of high PMH may be different from the socioeconomic pattern of low PMH.

Keywords

  • Self-esteem
  • Self-efficacy
  • Socioeconomic inequalities
  • Mental wellbeing
  • Positive mental health
  • Social competence

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants in HBSC-MDS 2012. We would also like to thank the Mental Health Research Group, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, for valuable discussions and reflections during the development and validation of the measures of positive mental health.

This study was funded by the Nordea Foundation (02-2011-0122). The funders have had no influence on study design, data collection, analyses, interpretation of results or writing of the manuscript.

Citation

Nielsen, L., Stewart-Brown, S., Vinther-Larsen, M., Meilstrup, C., Holstein, B. and Koushede, V. (2016), "High and low levels of positive mental health: are there socioeconomic differences among adolescents?", Journal of Public Mental Health, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-10-2014-0041

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication Sitemap

Policies and information

  • Legal Opens in new window
  • Editorial policy Opens in new window & originality guidelines Opens in new window
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald’s Library Advisory Network?

    You can start or join in a discussion here.
    If you’d like to know more about The Network, please email us

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Frequently Asked Questions

    Your questions answered here