To read this content please select one of the options below:

School as setting to create a healthy teaching and learning environment: Using the health promoting school model to foster school-health partnership

Albert Lee (Centre for Health Education and Health Promotion, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China) (Hong Kong Health Education and Health Promotion Foundation, Hong Kong, China)
Robin Man-biu Cheung (Department of Education Policy and Administration, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

Journal of Professional Capital and Community

ISSN: 2056-9548

Article publication date: 16 October 2017

660

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to analyze how professional cultures in schools and school systems could improve the well-being of students, with a particular emphasis on teacher-health partnerships, which would not naturally occur without a specific intentional intervention. Implemented with a whole-school approach, the Health Promoting School (HPS) is one of the most effective intentional interventions to achieve improvements in both the health and educational outcomes of students through the engagement of key stakeholders in education and health to create a healthy physical/psycho-social environment. This paper emphasizes collaboration and the building of professional cultures in schools that share collective responsibility for the whole student.

Design/methodology/approach

Student outcomes in schools should include both academic and health and well-being outcomes that promote positive pathways throughout adulthood. This paper connects HPS research with policy analysis drawing on Hong Kong’s unique context as being at the top of the PISA rankings and striving toward a positive health culture and well-being in its schools.

Findings

Evidence has been gathered extensively about what schools actually do in health promotion using the HPS framework. The HPS framework has served to assist schools and authorities to concentrate on the gaps and affirm best practices. This paper also reports how teachers have created a professional and collegial community with health partners to address outbreaks of infectious diseases in schools and obesity in students.

Practical implications

The concept of HPS can serve as an ecological model to promote the positive health and well-being of students, fostering their personal growth and development, and as an alternate model for school improvement.

Social implications

This paper has highlighted that structured school health programs such as HPS could have positive effects on educational outcomes, while also changing professional cultures and communities in schools with an emphasis on students’ physical health, emotional health, social health, or spiritual health. The Assessment Program for Affective and Social Outcomes is used as a tool by schools in Hong Kong, reflecting the affective and social developments of the students in the school under review as a whole, and how they relate to the school. It resembles the core areas of action competencies, and school social environment; the two key areas of HPS.

Originality/value

Hong Kong is often analyzed from an educational rankings perspective. However, it offers broader lessons on educational change, as it has in recent years emphasized dual goals in student outcomes and professional communities – the importance of whole student health and well-being as a both a precursor and key component to the educational outcomes schools seek. Globally, very few schools are able to implement HPS in its entirety. Continuing development of HPS in Hong Kong would add value to international literature in terms of which types of data would influence adoption of HPS in which types of school and policy contexts.

Keywords

Citation

Lee, A. and Cheung, R.M.-b. (2017), "School as setting to create a healthy teaching and learning environment: Using the health promoting school model to foster school-health partnership", Journal of Professional Capital and Community, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 200-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2017-0013

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles