To read this content please select one of the options below:

Local option sales taxes and county rainy day funds

Helisse Levine (School of Business Public Administration and Information Sciences, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY)
Marc Fudge (Department of Public Administration, California State University, San Bernardino)
Geoffrey Propheter (New York City Independent Budget Office)

Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management

ISSN: 1096-3367

Article publication date: 1 March 2016

103

Abstract

Rainy day stabilization funds (RDSFs) and local option sales taxes (LOSTs) are two strategies local governments deploy to combat fiscal stress. While the literature on both is robust, it has thus far failed to consider empirically that the two may be connected. One way the marginal LOST dollar could be spent is by saving it for future use. We test the connection with a sample of 414 counties and correct for selection bias with the Heckman correction technique. We find that each $10 increase in LOST revenue per capita is associated with a $0.10 increase in undesignated general fund balance. Though small, the positive effect size supports the theory that LOSTs contribute to a greater propensity to save.

Citation

Levine, H., Fudge, M. and Propheter, G. (2016), "Local option sales taxes and county rainy day funds", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-28-04-2016-B003

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016 by PrAcademics Press

Related articles