To read this content please select one of the options below:

Budget theory in local government: the process-outcome conundrum

Janet M. Kelly (Department of Political Science, and a Faculty Associate at the Howard H. Baker, Jr. Center for Public Policy, University of Tennessee)
William C. Rivenbark (Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management

ISSN: 1096-3367

Article publication date: 1 March 2008

306

Abstract

Local government budget processes have changed substantially since the early 1990s, due in part to an expanded emphasis on performance accountability and the availability of information technology. We present evidence that local government budget outcomes also have changed over the same time period when disaggregated at the functional level. Though we do not assert a causal relationship between the two, our findings indicate that the normative-descriptive gap in budget theory described by Rubin (1990) deserves new scholarly attention. Our profession’s attraction to incrementalism may have blurred the success of budget reform in local government.

Citation

Kelly, J.M. and Rivenbark, W.C. (2008), "Budget theory in local government: the process-outcome conundrum", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 484-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-20-04-2008-B005

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008 by PrAcademics Press

Related articles