To read this content please select one of the options below:

Going GAGAS for due process: examining Yellow Book standard participation

Renee Flasher (School of Business Administration, Penn State Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, USA)
Michelle Lau (Goodman School of Business, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada)
Dara M. Marshall (College of Business Administration, Texas A&M University Central Texas, Killeen, Texas, USA)

Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management

ISSN: 1096-3367

Article publication date: 6 May 2020

Issue publication date: 15 June 2020

122

Abstract

Purpose

The US federal government requires auditors to follow governmental auditing standards when performing audits of entities expending significant federal government dollars. This study explores stakeholder participation during the comment letter phase of government auditing standard setting to determine if participation is symbolic or substantive.

Design/methodology/approach

Researchers conduct an analysis of the 179 comment letters submitted to the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) and received for their 2010 and 2017 exposure drafts of government auditing standards.

Findings

The distribution of stakeholder participation groups in the government auditing standard-setting process differs from the distribution in the private company auditing standard-setting process. On average, participants submit letters that are greater than two pages in length. Participants also contribute feedback on topics that the GAO directly solicits. Taken together, the results demonstrate stakeholder behaviors that are consistent with a substantive rather than symbolic due process involvement for government auditing standards.

Research limitations/implications

Stakeholder beliefs are inferred based on the observed behavior of comment letter submissions. Also, there is a subjective element to the classification of the comment letters for the study.

Practical Implications

Given the far-reaching implications of Yellow Book auditing standards on public, private and nonprofit entities, the findings are relevant to a heterogeneous audience. This study reveals opportunities for users of government auditing standards, practitioners and academics for greater involvement in due process standard setting to bring additional legitimacy to the GAO and its standard-setting activities.

Originality/value

Beyond the current study, little empirical research examines Yellow Book auditing standards or the due process through which these standards are established. This is the first study to examine the complete set of comment letters for the 2010 and 2017 exposure drafts of government auditing standards.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the research assistance of Brandon Phelps and the feedback from participants at the 2019 Diversity and 2020 Government and Nonprofit Section Meetings of the American Accounting Association.

Citation

Flasher, R., Lau, M. and Marshall, D.M. (2020), "Going GAGAS for due process: examining Yellow Book standard participation", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-08-2019-0129

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles