To read this content please select one of the options below:

SEC issues new guidance on excluding shareholder proposals under rule 14a-8

John Newell (Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, USA)
Arthur McGivern (Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, USA)
David Roberts (Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, USA)

Journal of Investment Compliance

ISSN: 1528-5812

Article publication date: 4 July 2016

71

Abstract

Purpose

To explain SEC Division of Corporation Finance Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14H (SLB 14H), which provides interpretive advice on how the Staff will treat shareholder proposals under the “directly conflicts” and “ordinary business” exclusions under Rule 14a-8.

Design/methodology/approach

Explains Rule 14-8 concerning the inclusion of shareholder proposals in a company’s proxy materials, Rule 14a-8(i)(9) on substantive bases for exclusion of shareholder proposals, guidance from SLB 14H on shareholder proposals that do and do not directly conflict with company proposals, Staff guidance prior to SLB 14H, the “ordinary business” exclusion under Rule 14a-8(i)(7), and how SEC staff guidance differs from the majority opinion in Trinity Wall Street v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. on the ordinary business exclusion.

Findings

The SEC Staff’s new standard for conflicting proposals is likely to make it more difficult for companies to exclude a shareholder proposal that is different from a management proposal if the two proposals are not “mutually exclusive”. Staff guidance also states that companies may not exclude proposals focusing on a significant policy issue under the ordinary business exclusion if “the proposals would transcend the day-to-day business matters and raise policy issues so significant that it would be appropriate for a shareholder vote”.

Originality/value

Expert guidance from experienced securities and financial services lawyers.

Keywords

Citation

Newell, J., McGivern, A. and Roberts, D. (2016), "SEC issues new guidance on excluding shareholder proposals under rule 14a-8", Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 23-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOIC-04-2016-0011

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016 Goodwin Procter LLP. All rights reserved.

Related articles