To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Fit perceptions, work engagement, satisfaction and commitment

Bruce Rayton (School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK)
Zeynep Y. Yalabik (School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK)
Andriana Rapti (Department of Management and MIS, School of Business, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 9 August 2019

Issue publication date: 21 August 2019

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between fit (organization and job) perceptions and work engagement (WE).

Design/methodology/approach

The authors deployed a two-wave survey among 377 clerical employees of the specialist lending division of a large UK bank, with the waves separated by 12 months.

Findings

The results show a positive relationship between person organization (PO) and person job (PJ) fit perceptions (at Time 1) and WE (at Time 2). Job satisfaction (JS) and affective commitment (AC) dual-mediate these relationships. The effect of PO fit on WE manifests primarily via AC, while the effect of PJ fit manifests primarily via JS.

Practical implications

The study indicates that organizations should consider the fit of employees to their jobs and the organization when designing interventions intended to increase WE. Also, potential synergies exist between organizational interventions designed to influence employee attitudes focused on similar units of analysis: e.g., PJ fit with JS or PO fit with AC.

Originality/value

This study provides the first investigation of the dual-mediation, via JS and AC, of the effects of both PJ and PO fit on WE. Furthermore, the use of a time-lagged design strengthens the evidence for the novel hypotheses of this study and enables verification of findings in the extant literature.

Keywords

Citation

Rayton, B., Yalabik, Z.Y. and Rapti, A. (2019), "Fit perceptions, work engagement, satisfaction and commitment", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2018-0074

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited