To read this content please select one of the options below:

Applicant, rater, and job factors related to weight-based bias

Dianna Contreras Krueger (Management Department, Henderson State University, Arkadelphia, Arkansas, USA)
Dianna L. Stone (Management Department, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA)
Eugene Stone-Romero (Management Department, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 4 February 2014

1779

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper was to assess the main and interactive effects of job applicant conscientiousness, and nurturing job demands on ratings of overweight female applicants on job suitability and a hiring recommendation. It also examined relations between rater ethnicity and ratings of the job suitability of normal and overweight applicants.

Design/methodology/approach

The study used a 2×2×2 experimental design and data from 400 individuals (201 Anglos and 199 Hispanics) with hiring experience to test the study's hypotheses. Participants were randomly assigned to conditions, and asked to review a resume and picture of a normal or overweight applicant. Then, they were asked to rate the applicant's job suitability and make a hiring recommendation.

Findings

The results revealed that: overweight female applicants were rated as more suitable for jobs and more likely to be recommended for hire when they had high rather than low conscientiousness; Hispanics were more likely to recommend overweight applicants for hire than Anglos; and there was a three-way interaction among applicant weight, rater ethnicity, and nurturing job demands for the hiring recommendation criterion.

Research limitations/implications

The study was conducted in a simulated hiring context. Thus, research is needed to determine if the results generalize to actual work settings.

Practical implications

The results suggest that organizations should provide decision makers with detailed information about applicants' conscientiousness, and the nurturing demands of jobs. When these types of information are presented, raters are less likely to display weight-based bias.

Originality/value

Previous research on weight-based bias was not based on a theoretical model, but the present study used a theoretical framework to guide the development of hypotheses (Stone and Colella, 1996; Stone et al., 1992). In addition, it is the first study to examine the effects of overweight applicant conscientiousness and stereotype-job fit on ratings of job suitability, and differences between Hispanic and Anglo views of overweight applicants.

Keywords

Citation

Contreras Krueger, D., L. Stone, D. and Stone-Romero, E. (2014), "Applicant, rater, and job factors related to weight-based bias", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 164-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2012-0057

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles