Peer supported open dialogue in a UK NHS trust – a qualitative exploration of clients’ and network members’ experiences

Abstract

Purpose

As the evidence base in relation to open dialogue continues to grow and develop, this paper contributes to the growing evidence base within the UK. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the experiences of those who have received the service and reports a qualitative evaluation of an open dialogue service operating within the National Health Service of the UK.

Design/methodology/approach

The opportunity to participate was offered to all those who had received open dialogue within this particular National Health Service (NHS) trust. In total, seven participants, from four different social networks, participated in the research and attended semi-structured focus groups. The audio recordings of all focus groups were transcribed and the data as subjected to inductive thematic analysis.

Findings

The results provide an insight into the lived experience of the individuals who received open dialogue. The analysis of the data gathered in the focus groups revealed three major themes: relational mutuality, dichotomy with other mental health services and dialogical freedom.

Practical implications

The results suggest that individuals and networks positively experienced receiving open dialogue, particularly in relation to the way in which they were able to relate to, and work with practitioners. However, the results did also raise some issues in relation to the complications of introducing the open dialogue model into existing NHS structures.

Originality/value

This research contributes to the emerging evidence base in relation to open dialogue, especially considering the current lack of existing research undertaken within the UK.

Citation

Hendy, C. and Pearson, M. (2020), "Peer supported open dialogue in a UK NHS trust – a qualitative exploration of clients’ and network members’ experiences", The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-10-2019-0052