Recovery Colleges; how effective are they?

Abstract

Purpose

Recovery Colleges are education-based mental health resources, utilising practitioner and lived experience expertise, promoting skills to enhance student independence. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of engagement with a Recovery College in Northern England on student wellbeing.

Design/methodology/approach

Feedback questionnaires were analysed from 89 students attending the Recovery College. Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMBS) and “Empower Flower” (a measure of personal resources) data for 56 students were compared pre- and post-attendance at courses.

Findings

The SWEMBS and Empower Flower indicated improvements in wellbeing and personal resources pre- to post-attendance at Recovery College courses. Satisfaction with the service was high. Students saw the service as unique, accepting and enabling. Students noted they developed a sense of hope, confidence and aspirations. They related this to practical changes, e.g. increasing work-related activity and decreasing service use.

Research limitations/implications

This research suggests that there is a need for further evaluation of the unique contribution that Recovery Colleges can make to mental wellbeing, and the mechanisms involved in promoting the process of recovery.

Practical implications

The Recovery College may be a cost-effective way to provide a supportive recovery-orientated environment which promotes students’ ability to build self-confidence and skills, enabling them to connect with others and progress towards independence and valued goals. This complements more traditional mental health services.

Originality/value

This paper reports on an area of mental health development where there is very limited research, adding valuable data to the literature.

Citation

Ebrahim, S., Glascott, A., Mayer, H. and Gair, E. (2018), "Recovery Colleges; how effective are they?", The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-09-2017-0056