RCT evaluating provider outcomes by suicide prevention training modality: in-person vs. e-learning

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate provider outcomes in response to two modes of suicide prevention training (e-learning and in-person) and a control group. The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) was adapted for e-learning delivery to US Veterans Administration mental health providers. Outcomes include: self-evaluated beliefs, ability, and self-efficacy in managing suicidal patients.

Design/methodology/approach

This study used a multicenter, randomized, cluster design to test the effectiveness of e-learning vs in-person conditions CAMS for changes in provider outcomes.

Findings

Survey scores showed significant improvements for both the e-learning vs control and the in-person vs control between pre-intervention and post-intervention; however, the e-learning and in-person conditions were not significantly different from each other.

Research limitations/implications

Limitations of the study include that there were drop-outs over the study period and the survey questions may not have captured all of the aspects of the CAMS training.

Practical implications

Results suggest that e-learning training modules can provide comparable outcomes to in-person training for suicide prevention.

Social implications

More providers may have accessible training materials for managing suicidal patients.

Originality/value

Currently practicing providers now can choose between two equivalent training modalities for improving the management of suicidality in their patients.

Citation

Magruder, K.M., York, J.A., Knapp, R.G., Yeager, D.E., Marshall, E. and DeSantis, M. (2015), "RCT evaluating provider outcomes by suicide prevention training modality: in-person vs. e-learning", The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-09-2014-0028