To read this content please select one of the options below:

Disharmony in New Harmony: insights from the narcissistic leadership of Robert Owen

John H. Humphreys (Department of Management, Texas A&M University – Commerce, Commerce, Texas, USA)
Milorad M. Novicevic (Department of Management, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USA)
Mario Hayek (Department of Management, Texas A&M University – Commerce, Commerce, Texas, USA)
Jane Whitney Gibson (Department of Management, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA)
Stephanie S. Pane Haden (Department of Management, Texas A&M University – Commerce, Commerce, Texas, USA)
Wallace A. Williams, Jr (Department of Management, Texas A&M University – Commerce, Commerce, Texas, USA)

Journal of Management History

ISSN: 1751-1348

Article publication date: 11 April 2016

1922

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to narratively explore the influence of leader narcissism on leader/follower social exchange. Moreover, while researchers acknowledge that narcissistic personality is a dimensional construct, the preponderance of extant literature approaches the concept of narcissistic leadership categorically by focusing on the reactive or constructive narcissistic extremes. This bimodal emphasis ignores self-deceptive forms of narcissistic leadership, where vision orientation and communication could differ from leaders with more reactive or constructive narcissistic personalities.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors argue that they encountered a compelling example of a communal, self-deceiving narcissist during archival research of Robert Owen’s collective experiment at New Harmony, Indiana. To explore Owen’s narcissistic leadership, they utilize an analytically structured history approach to interpret his leadership, as he conveyed his vision of social reform in America.

Findings

Approaching data from a ‘history to theory’ perspective and via a communicative lens, the authors use insights from their abductive analysis to advance a cross-paradigm, communication-centered process model of narcissistic leadership that accounts for the full dimensional nature of leader narcissism and the relational aspects of narcissistic leadership.

Research limitations/implications

Scholars maintaining a positivist stance might consider this method a limitation, as historical case-based research places greater emphasis on reflexivity than replication. However, from a constructionist perspective, a focus on generalization might be considered inappropriate or premature, potentially hampering the revelation of insights.

Originality/value

Through a multi-paradigmatic analysis of the historical case of Robert Owen and his visionary communal experiment at New Harmony, the authors contribute to the extant literature by elaborating a comprehensive, dimensional and relational process framework of narcissistic leadership. In doing so, the authors have heeded calls to better delineate leader narcissism, embrace process and relational aspects of leadership and consider leader communication as constitutive of leadership.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the helpful staff at the Working Men’s Institute Museum and Library in New Harmony, Indiana, for their assistance with the Branigin Archive, which houses manuscripts and books from the Harmonist and Owen communal societies.

Citation

Humphreys, J.H., Novicevic, M.M., Hayek, M., Gibson, J.W., Pane Haden, S.S. and Williams, Jr, W.A. (2016), "Disharmony in New Harmony: insights from the narcissistic leadership of Robert Owen", Journal of Management History, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 146-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-05-2015-0167

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles