To read this content please select one of the options below:

How to counter organisational inertia to enable knowledge management practices adoption in public sector organisations

Mona Ashok (Department of Business Informatics, Systems and Accounting, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Reading, UK)
Mouza Saeed Mohammed Al Badi Al Dhaheri (Department of Knowledge Systems, Human Resources Authority, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Rohit Madan (Department of Business Informatics, Systems, and Accounting, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Reading, UK)
Michael D. Dzandu (Westminster Business School, Centre for Digital Business Research, University of Westminster, London, UK)

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Article publication date: 24 March 2021

Issue publication date: 17 November 2021

2830

Abstract

Purpose

Knowledge management (KM) is associated with higher performance and innovative culture; KM can help the public sector to be fiscally lean and meet diverse stakeholders’ needs. However, hierarchical structures, bureaucratic culture and rigid processes inhibit KM adoption and generate inertia. This study aims to explore the nature and causes of this inertia within the context of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) public sector.

Design/methodology/approach

Using an in-depth case study of a UAE public sector organisation, this study explores how organisational inertia can be countered to enable KM adoption. Semi-structured interviews are conducted with 17 top- and middle-level managers from operational, management and strategic levels. Interview data is triangulated with content analysis from multiple sources, including the UAE Government and case organisation documents.

Findings

The results show transformation leadership, external factors and organisational culture mediate the negative effect of inertia on KM practices adoption. We find that information technology plays a key role in enabling knowledge creation, access, adoption and sharing. Furthermore, we uncover a virtuous cycle between organisational culture and KM practices adoption in the public sector. In addition, we develop a new model (the relationship between KM practices, organisational inertia, organisational culture, transformational leadership traits and external factors) and four propositions for empirical testing by future researchers. We also present a cross-case comparison of our results with six private/quasi-private sector cases who have implemented KM practices.

Research limitations/implications

Qualitative data is collected from a single case study.

Originality/value

Inertia in a public section is a result of bureaucracy and authority bounded by the rules and regulations. Adopting a qualitative methodology and case study method, the research explores the phenomena of how inertia impacts KM adoption in public sector environments. Our findings reveal the underlying mechanisms of how internal and external organisational factors impact inertia. Internally, supportive organisational culture and transformational leadership traits positively effect KM adoption, which, in turn, has a positive effect on organisational culture to counter organisational inertia. Externally, a progressive national culture, strategy and policy can support a knowledge-based organisation that embraces change. This study develops a new model (interactions between internal and external factors impacting KM practices in the public sector), four propositions and a new two-stage process model for KM adoption in the public sector. We present a case-comparison of how the constructs interact in a public sector as compared to six private/quasi-private sector cases from the literature.

Keywords

Citation

Ashok, M., Al Badi Al Dhaheri, M.S.M., Madan, R. and Dzandu, M.D. (2021), "How to counter organisational inertia to enable knowledge management practices adoption in public sector organisations", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 25 No. 9, pp. 2245-2273. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2020-0700

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles