To read this content please select one of the options below:

Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: the mediating role of psychological ownership

Jian Li (Business School, Hunan University, Hunan, China)
Ling Yuan (Business School, Hunan University, Hunan, China)
Lutao Ning (School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK)
Jason Li-Ying (DTU Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark)

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Article publication date: 12 October 2015

3523

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the meditating role of psychological ownership which includes both organisation-based psychological ownership (OPO) and knowledge-based psychological ownership (KPO) on the relationship between affective commitment and knowledge sharing.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper is an empirical study based on structural equation modelling, with a sample of 293 employees from 31 high-technology firms in China.

Findings

The result indicated that affective commitment had a significant positive effect on OPO but no effect on KPO; OPO was positively related to both common and key knowledge sharing, while KPO exerted a negative impact on both; common knowledge sharing was positively related to key knowledge sharing; the relationship between affective commitment and key knowledge sharing was multi-mediated by OPO and common knowledge sharing.

Originality/value

OPO and KPO play an essential role in transferring the effect of employees’ affective commitment to common knowledge sharing and key knowledge sharing, which unravels the blackbox of how effective commitment affects knowledge sharing.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Professor Rory Chase, the Editor in Chief of JKM, and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Citation

Li, J., Yuan, L., Ning, L. and Li-Ying, J. (2015), "Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: the mediating role of psychological ownership", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 1146-1166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2015-0043

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles