To read this content please select one of the options below:

Jurors’ judgements of an autistic defendant are influenced by awareness of autism, knowledge of psychological conditions and trait-empathy

Tiegan Blackhurst (Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK)
Calum Hartley (Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK)
Polly Turner (School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Lara Warmelink (Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK)

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour

ISSN: 2050-8824

Article publication date: 16 November 2022

Issue publication date: 22 November 2022

184

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate whether awareness of an ASD diagnostic label, knowledge of psychological conditions, and trait-empathy influence mock-jurors’ judgements of an autistic defendant. Some autistic adults have an increased risk of acting illegally and standing trial as a defendant because of their behavioural and cognitive characteristics. In court, they may display behaviours stereotypically perceived by jurors as indicators of guilt (e.g. averted gaze), potentially resulting in negative judgements. However, if autistic defendants disclose their condition, this may positively influence jurors’ judgements by offering an alternative explanation for their behaviour. This effect may be stronger in jurors who are highly knowledgeable about psychological conditions and empathic.

Design/methodology/approach

Non-autistic participants (N = 328; M age = 28.21) read a scenario about a defendant’s crime and courtroom behaviour before judging their character and reporting how empathic they felt towards the defendant. Participants were then informed that the defendant was autistic and provided with information about autism before re-evaluating the defendant. Participants’ empathy and knowledge of psychological conditions, including autism, were measured.

Findings

Participants judged the defendant to be more honest and less blameworthy post-label. Trait empathy was positively associated with honesty ratings and higher levels of self-reported empathy. Overall knowledge was negatively associated with ratings for defendant blameworthiness and likeability. Overall, the findings suggest that autistic defendants may benefit from disclosing their diagnosis as this may result in more favourable juror judgements.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to consider how jurors’ overall knowledge of psychological conditions and trait-empathy may influence judgements of an autistic defendant.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this research.

This research did not receive support from any third party.

There is no funding to report for this research.

Citation

Blackhurst, T., Hartley, C., Turner, P. and Warmelink, L. (2022), "Jurors’ judgements of an autistic defendant are influenced by awareness of autism, knowledge of psychological conditions and trait-empathy", Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, Vol. 13 No. 3/4, pp. 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-09-2022-0007

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles