Just say “no!” to lethal autonomous robotic weapons

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to consider the question of equipping fully autonomous robotic weapons with the capacity to kill. Current ideas concerning the feasibility and advisability of developing and deploying such weapons, including the proposal that they be equipped with a so-called “ethical governor”, are reviewed and critiqued. The perspective adopted for this study includes software engineering practice as well as ethical and legal aspects of the use of lethal autonomous robotic weapons.

Design/methodology/approach

In the paper, the author survey and critique the applicable literature.

Findings

In the current paper, the author argue that fully autonomous robotic weapons with the capacity to kill should neither be developed nor deployed, that research directed toward equipping such weapons with a so-called “ethical governor” is immoral and serves as an “ethical smoke-screen” to legitimize research and development of these weapons and that, as an ethical duty, engineers and scientists should condemn and refuse to participate in their development.

Originality/value

This is a new approach to the argument for banning autonomous lethal robotic weapons based on classical work of Joseph Weizenbaum, Helen Nissenbaum and others.

Citation

Fleischman, W.M. (2015), "Just say “no!” to lethal autonomous robotic weapons", Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, Vol. 13 No. 3/4, pp. 299-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-12-2014-0065