To read this content please select one of the options below:

User involvement in assisted reproductive technologies: England and Portugal

Catarina Samorinha (EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal)
Mateusz Lichon (Institute of Sociology, Jagiellonian Univeristy, Krakow, Poland)
Susana Silva (EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal)
Mike Dent (Faculty of Health Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK)

Journal of Health Organization and Management

ISSN: 1477-7266

Article publication date: 17 August 2015

307

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to compare user involvement in the case of assisted reproductive technologies in England and Portugal through the concepts of voice, choice and co-production, assessing the implications for user empowerment.

Design/methodology/approach

This qualitative study draws primarily on policy review and uses exploratory semi-structured interviews with key informants as a way of illustrating points. Data on the following themes was compared: voice (users’ representativeness on licensing bodies and channels of communication between users and doctors); choice (funding and accessibility criteria; choice of fertility centres, doctors and level of care); and co-production (criteria through which users actively engage with health professionals in planning the treatment).

Findings

Inter- and intra-healthcare systems variations between the two countries on choice and co-production were identified. Differences between funding and accessibility, regions, public and private sectors and attitudes towards doctor-patient relationship (paternalistic/partnership) were the key issues. Although consumer choice and indicators of co-production are evident in treatment pathways in both countries, user empowerment is not. This is limited by inequalities in accessibility criteria, dependence on doctors’ individual perspectives and lack of genuine and formal hearing of citizens’ voice.

Originality/value

Enhancing users’ involvement claims for individual and organizational cultures reflecting user-centred values. Effective ways to incorporate users’ knowledge in shared decision making and co-design are needed to empower patients and to improve the delivery of care.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the interviewees, Kathryn Hartley and Working Group 3 of the EU COST Action IS0903. COST funded the research through two Short-Term Scientific Missions. The authors thank the Operational Programme Factors of Competitiveness (COMPETE/FEDER) and Foundation for Science and Technology (Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science) for funding the project FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-014453 and the PhD fellowship SFRH/BD/75807/2011.

Citation

Samorinha, C., Lichon, M., Silva, S. and Dent, M. (2015), "User involvement in assisted reproductive technologies: England and Portugal", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 582-594. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2014-0202

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles