The purpose of this paper is to analyze how staff and managers in health and social care organizations use scientific evidence when making decisions about the organization of care practices.
Document analysis and repeated interviews (2008-2010) with staff (n=39) and managers (n=26) in health and social care organizations. The respondents were involved in a randomized controlled study about testing a continuum of care model for older people.
Scientific evidence had no practical function in the social care organization, while it was a prioritized source of information in the health care organization. This meant that the decision making regarding care practices was different in these organizations. Social care tended to rely on ad hoc practice-based information and political decisions when organizing care, while health care to some extent also relied in an unreflected manner on the scientific knowledge.
The study illustrates several difficulties that might occur when managers and staff try to consider scientific evidence when making complicated decisions about care practices.
The authors would like to thank all the interview respondents. The Vårdal Institute financed this implementation study and the development and evaluation of the intervention “Continuum of care for frail elderly persons, from the emergency ward to living at home intervention.” In addition, the project received funding from the Vinnvård research program. The first author also received a postdoctoral funding from ERA-AGE2, Future Leaders of Ageing Research in Europe (FLARE)/Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.
Hasson, H., Blomberg, S., Dunér, A. and Sarvimäki, A. (2016), "Significance of scientific evidence in organizing care processes", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 597-612. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2013-0271Download as .RIS
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited