To read this content please select one of the options below:

Past, present and future challenges in health care priority setting: Findings from an international expert survey

William Hall (Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada) (Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada)
Iestyn Williams (University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK)
Neale Smith (Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada)
Marthe Gold (The City College of New York, New York, New York, USA)
Joanna Coast (University of Bristol, Bristol, UK)
Lydia Kapiriri (Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada)
M. Danis (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA)
Craig Mitton (Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada) (School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada)

Journal of Health Organization and Management

ISSN: 1477-7266

Article publication date: 18 April 2018

Issue publication date: 17 May 2018

1125

Abstract

Purpose

Current conditions have intensified the need for health systems to engage in the difficult task of priority setting. As the search for a “magic bullet” is replaced by an appreciation for the interplay between evidence, interests, culture, and outcomes, progress in relation to these dimensions requires assessment of achievements to date and identification of areas where knowledge and practice require attention most urgently. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

Design/methodology/approach

An international survey was administered to experts in the area of priority setting. The survey consisted of open-ended questions focusing on notable achievements, policy and practice challenges, and areas for future research in the discipline of priority setting. It was administered online between February and March of 2015.

Findings

“Decision-making frameworks” and “Engagement” were the two most frequently mentioned notable achievements. “Priority setting in practice” and “Awareness and education” were the two most frequently mentioned policy and practical challenges. “Priority setting in practice” and “Engagement” were the two most frequently mentioned areas in need of future research.

Research limitations/implications

Sampling bias toward more developed countries. Future study could use findings to create a more concise version to distribute more broadly.

Practical implications

Globally, these findings could be used as a platform for discussion and decision making related to policy, practice, and research in this area.

Originality/value

Whilst this study reaffirmed the continued importance of many longstanding themes in the priority setting literature, it is possible to also discern clear shifts in emphasis as the discipline progresses in response to new challenges.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants who responded to the survey, and would like to acknowledge Jenny Harlock and Evelina Balandyte for their invaluable assistance in administering the survey and collecting responses.

Citation

Hall, W., Williams, I., Smith, N., Gold, M., Coast, J., Kapiriri, L., Danis, M. and Mitton, C. (2018), "Past, present and future challenges in health care priority setting: Findings from an international expert survey", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 444-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2018-0005

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles