To read this content please select one of the options below:

Physicians’ accounts of frontline tensions when implementing pilot projects to improve primary care

Elizabeth Mansfield (Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada) (Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada)
Onil Bhattacharyya (Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada)
Jennifer Christian (University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada)
Gary Naglie (Department of Medicine and Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada)
Vicky Steriopoulos (Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada)
Fiona Webster (Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy and Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada)

Journal of Health Organization and Management

ISSN: 1477-7266

Article publication date: 22 January 2018

Issue publication date: 6 March 2018

377

Abstract

Purpose

Canada’s primary care system has been described as “a culture of pilot projects” with little evidence of converting successful initiatives into funded, permanent programs or sharing project outcomes and insights across jurisdictions. Health services pilot projects are advocated as an effective strategy for identifying promising models of care and building integrated care partnerships in local settings. In the qualitative study reported here, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the strengths and challenges of this approach.

Design/methodology/approach

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 primary care physicians who discussed their experiences as pilot project leads. Following thematic analysis methods, broad system issues were captured as well as individual project information.

Findings

While participants often portrayed themselves as advocates for vulnerable patients, mobilizing healthcare organizations and providers to support new models of care was discussed as challenging. Competition between local healthcare providers and initiatives could impact pilot project success. Participants also reported tensions between their clinical, project management and research roles with additional time demands and skill requirements interfering with the work of implementing and evaluating service innovations.

Originality/value

Study findings highlight the complexity of pilot project implementation, which encompasses physician commitment to addressing care for vulnerable populations through to the need for additional skill set requirements and the impact of local project environments. The current pilot project approach could be strengthened by including more multidisciplinary collaboration and providing infrastructure supports to enhance the design, implementation and evaluation of health services improvement initiatives.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care. Dr Naglie is supported by the George, Margaret and Gary Hunt Family Chair in Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto. The funding sources played no role in the conduct of the study, data collection and analysis or the preparation of the manuscript.

Citation

Mansfield, E., Bhattacharyya, O., Christian, J., Naglie, G., Steriopoulos, V. and Webster, F. (2018), "Physicians’ accounts of frontline tensions when implementing pilot projects to improve primary care", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2017-0013

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles