To read this content please select one of the options below:

The work is never ending: uncovering teamwork sustainability using realistic evaluation

Mandus Frykman (Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden)
Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz (Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden)
Åsa Muntlin Athlin (School of Nursing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia) (Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden) (Department of Emergency Care, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden) (Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden)
Henna Hasson (Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden) (Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine (CES), Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden)
Pamela Mazzocato (Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden)

Journal of Health Organization and Management

ISSN: 1477-7266

Article publication date: 20 March 2017

1205

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to uncover the mechanisms influencing the sustainability of behavior changes following the implementation of teamwork.

Design/methodology/approach

Realistic evaluation was combined with a framework (DCOM®) based on applied behavior analysis to study the sustainability of behavior changes two and a half years after the initial implementation of teamwork at an emergency department. The DCOM® framework was used to categorize the mechanisms of behavior change interventions (BCIs) into the four categories of direction, competence, opportunity, and motivation. Non-participant observation and interview data were used.

Findings

The teamwork behaviors were not sustained. A substantial fallback in managerial activities in combination with a complex context contributed to reduced direction, opportunity, and motivation. Reduced direction made staff members unclear about how and why they should work in teams. Deterioration of opportunity was evident from the lack of problem-solving resources resulting in accumulated barriers to teamwork. Motivation in terms of management support and feedback was reduced.

Practical implications

The implementation of complex organizational changes in complex healthcare contexts requires continuous adaption and managerial activities well beyond the initial implementation period.

Originality/value

By integrating the DCOM® framework with realistic evaluation, this study responds to the call for theoretically based research on behavioral mechanisms that can explain how BCIs interact with context and how this interaction influences sustainability.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all staff and managers who participated in the study. The study was financed by AFA Insurance, Registration No. 100249. Authors’ contributions: UvTS and AMA initiated the TEPPP project and secured ethical approval and funding. MF, UvTS, AMA, HH, and PM jointly conceived the idea for this study. MF, UvTS, and PM performed observations, while MF and PM performed the interviews and the collection of documents. MF performed the literature search in collaboration with PM. MF and PM analyzed the data, and UvTS and AMA reviewed the analyses. MF and PM wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the drafting of the manuscript and provided critical revision.

Citation

Frykman, M., von Thiele Schwarz, U., Muntlin Athlin, Å., Hasson, H. and Mazzocato, P. (2017), "The work is never ending: uncovering teamwork sustainability using realistic evaluation", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2016-0020

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles