Embedding psychological thinking: an evaluation of a regional training model for probation staff

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to outline the qualitative evaluation of a training package delivered to offender managers (OMs) working to support the implementation of the national Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) pathway and to examine qualitative changes in the way participants approach case material pre- and post-training.

Design/methodology/approach

In total, 21 pre- and 21 post-training responses to a case vignette were recorded and used in the analysis. OMs were asked what they would like to know more about and what would they focus on with the individual in the vignette. The responses were matched and the vignettes pre- and post-training were identical except for the name of the (fictional) offender.

Findings

The responses were subjected to a thematic analysis and, whilst themes were similar both between questions and within each question over time, post-training responses focussed more on the offender’s relationship with the OM and showed a greater appreciation for the relevance of internal motivations (not just what but why). This tendency was less evident in all responses regarding risk/offending.

Originality/value

The OPD pathway is focussed on learning. The work is innovative and this paper adds to the body of early evidence which will hopefully inform future developments. In particular, the importance of involvement of probation stakeholders in the design and delivery of training is highlighted. In addition, it is expected that future research will focus on the impact of continued supervision for the participants in this study and, as such, this paper forms the beginning of a process of evaluating how and when various workforce development interventions are effective.

Citation

Mapplebeck, C., Ramsden, J., Lowton, M., Short, S. and Burn, F. (2017), "Embedding psychological thinking: an evaluation of a regional training model for probation staff", The Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-12-2015-0053