Women at the centre – using formulation to enhance partnership-working: a case study
Abstract
Purpose
The 2011 Offender Personality Disorder Strategy promoted formulation-led approaches to offender management. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how formulation can inform partnership-working with women offenders, specifically those with complex needs including personality difficulties.
Design/methodology/approach
Learning from partnership case-work is shared to highlight a psychological understanding of the needs of one female offender, and the organisational system operating around her.
Findings
The paper describes the development of a “volcano metaphor” as a conceptual framework to assist workers, without psychological training, to better understand the complexity of a client’s intense emotional world. It also reflects the impact of an individualised formulation for through-the-gate working.
Practical implications
The challenges and advantages of “joined-up” inter-agency working are highlighted, including some ideas on how to promote consistency. These include the use of formulation as the basis for decision making and to help “contain” strong emotions attached to working with complex women offenders. Importance is attached to stable and appropriate housing for such women by anticipating their resettlement needs prior to points of transition, and coordinating provision through multi-agency public protection arrangements.
Originality/value
The paper’s originality lies with the development of the volcano diagram as an accessible format for considering individualised formulation and risk assessment. The paper also offers detailed reflections on wider systemic processes attached to working with complex women offenders. It is particularly relevant to psychological practitioners working within probation and prisons, and also to offender managers.
Keywords
Citation
Maltman, L.J. and Turner, E.L. (2017), "Women at the centre – using formulation to enhance partnership-working: a case study", The Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-02-2016-0013
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited