To read this content please select one of the options below:

Corporate governance challenges and opportunities in mitigating corporate fraud in Malaysia

Emelia A. Girau (Universiti Teknologi Mara – Cawangan Sabah Kampus, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia)
Imbarine Bujang (Universiti Teknologi Mara – Cawangan Sabah Kampus, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia)
Agnes Paulus Jidwin (Universiti Teknologi Mara – Cawangan Sabah Kampus, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia)
Jamaliah Said (Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia)

Journal of Financial Crime

ISSN: 1359-0790

Article publication date: 1 July 2021

Issue publication date: 14 March 2022

1782

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the relationship between corporate governance and the likelihood of corporate fraud in Malaysia.

Design/methodology/approach

The sample of fraudulent companies in this study is the public listed companies that were charged with furnishing false statements to the Securities Commission of Malaysia and Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad and was listed in the Malaysian Securities Commission Enforcement Release from the year 2000 to 2016. The non-fraudulent companies, which are the control companies in this study, were selected from public listed companies listed in Bursa Malaysia, based on their similarity to the fraudulent companies in terms of time, size and industry type. The panel probit regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between corporate governance characteristics and the occurrence of corporate fraud.

Findings

The findings of this study suggest that board size and executive directors’ compensation are the corporate governance characteristics that can effectively combat corporate fraud incidences in Malaysia. The corporate governance features, namely the board of directors’ independence, frequency of board meetings, CEO duality, CEO’s age, and share ownership owned by directors and CEO, do not significantly influence corporate fraud incidences in Malaysia.

Originality/value

Although previous studies provide inconsistent findings on the association between board size and corporate fraud incidences, this study contributes to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence that smaller board sizes provide more effective monitoring functions to minimize corporate fraud incidences in the Malaysian context. The empirical evidence also supports the agency theory proposition where managers with high compensation will act in the best interest of shareholders and less likely to focus on their interests, thus deterring them from committing fraudulent acts.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to The Accounting Research Institute and Universiti Teknologi MARA for funding and facilitating this research project.

Citation

A. Girau, E., Bujang, I., Paulus Jidwin, A. and Said, J. (2022), "Corporate governance challenges and opportunities in mitigating corporate fraud in Malaysia", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 620-638. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2021-0045

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles