To read this content please select one of the options below:

Does financial development has (a)symmetric effect on environmental quality: insights from South Africa

James Temitope Dada (Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)
Titus Ayobami Ojeyinka (Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)
Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan (School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK) (Consultant in Economics and Finance, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)

Journal of Economic Studies

ISSN: 0144-3585

Article publication date: 4 October 2022

Issue publication date: 15 August 2023

216

Abstract

Purpose

This paper investigates the (a)symmetric effects of financial development in the presence of economic growth, energy consumption, urbanization and foreign direct investment on environmental quality of South Africa between 1980 and 2017.

Design/methodology/approach

A robust measure of financial development is generated using banking institutions and non-banking institutions market-based financial development indicators, while environmental quality is measured using carbon footprint, non-carbon footprint and ecological footprint. The objectives of the study are captured using linear and non-linear autoregressive distributed lag.

Findings

The result from the symmetric analysis suggests that financial development stimulates carbon footprint and ecological footprint in the short run; however, financial development abates non-carbon footprint. In the long run, financial development has a significant negative effect on carbon footprint and ecological footprint. However, the asymmetric analysis established strong asymmetric effect in the short run, while no asymmetric effect is found in the long run. The short run asymmetric analysis reveals that positive shock in financial development increases carbon footprint and ecological footprint; however, positive changes in financial development reduce non-carbon footprint. Negative shocks in financial development, on the other hand, have a positive impact carbon footprint, non-carbon footprint and ecological footprint.

Practical implications

The study's outcome implies that the concept of “more finance, more growth” could also be applied to “more finance, better environment” in South Africa. The study offers vital policy suggestions for the realization of sustainable development in South Africa.

Originality/value

This empiric adds to the body of knowledge on the influence of financial development on various components of environmental quality (carbon footprint, non-carbon footprint and ecological footprint) in South Africa.

Keywords

Citation

Dada, J.T., Ojeyinka, T.A. and Al-Faryan, M.A.S. (2023), "Does financial development has (a)symmetric effect on environmental quality: insights from South Africa", Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 50 No. 6, pp. 1130-1157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-06-2022-0352

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles