To read this content please select one of the options below:

Indirectly productive entrepreneurship

Alexandre Padilla (Department of Economics, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)
Nicolás Cachanosky (Department of Economics, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy

ISSN: 2045-2101

Article publication date: 15 August 2016




Since Baumol (1990), the economic literature has distinguished between two broad categories of entrepreneurship: productive and unproductive. The purpose of this paper is to introduce another subcategory: indirectly productive entrepreneurship. Sometimes, profit-seeking entrepreneurs allocate their talents to indirectly productive activities to mitigate the new costs market participants endure as a result of a government regulation. The resources used to mitigate these costs must be diverted from other uses.


This paper uses the example of cell phone storage outside New York City’s high schools to illustrate an indirectly productive entrepreneurial activity that mitigates the inefficiencies or costs created by a regulation. These costs and the resulting entrepreneurship would not have arisen absent the regulation.


These profit opportunities do not result from market entrepreneurial errors or successes but emerge from inefficiencies or unintended consequences produced by government regulations. When evaluating such entrepreneurship, the question is whether such regulation is desirable from an efficiency viewpoint because such entrepreneurship, while making such regulation less inefficient or less costly, diverts resources from other lines of production.


This paper identifies a new category of entrepreneurship: indirectly productive entrepreneurship. This paper also shows that government regulation often deters productive entrepreneurship. However, under some circumstances, regulation can indirectly encourage productive entrepreneurship by creating artificial profit opportunities that would not have existed otherwise.



The authors are thankful for helpful comments on the various drafts of this research paper from George Clarke, the participants at the 52nd Annual Conference of the Public Choice Society, the participants at the 85th Annual Meetings of the Southern Economic Association, and three anonymous referees. The usual caveats apply.


Padilla, A. and Cachanosky, N. (2016), "Indirectly productive entrepreneurship", Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 161-175.



Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles