To read this content please select one of the options below:

Crisis, innovation and change management: a blind spot for micro-firms?

Dimos Chatzinikolaou (Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece)
Charis Vlados (Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece; School of Business, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus and School of Social Sciences, Business and Organisation Administration, Hellenic Open University, Patra, Greece)

Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies

ISSN: 2053-4604

Article publication date: 27 October 2022

Issue publication date: 12 April 2024

206

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explore how the owners of less competitive micro-firms (MFs) perceive the “crisis–innovation–change management” triangle. It examines whether their understanding of these overarching entrepreneurship theory principles is inadequate compared to the relevant scientific literature.

Design/methodology/approach

This qualitative analysis follows principles based on the inductive method and grounded theory, thickly describing the results from research conducted in a sample of 38 tertiary-sector MFs in the Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region – one of the least developed and competitive areas across Europe. It triangulates the data with 11 respective small firms.

Findings

MF owners perceive the crisis as an ostensibly exogenous phenomenon, innovation as something quasi-unattainable – although vaguely significant – and change management as a relatively unknown process. This understanding lies somewhat distant from the extant literature that examines the structural nature of crises, the innovational power to exit profound restructurings and the rebalancing requisite for building new overall organizational methods to survive this internal–external transformation. In essence, the triangle crisis–innovation–change management is a blind spot for the examined MF owners as they ignore its significance as an adaptation mechanism – contrary to several direct competitors.

Social implications

Based on the reluctance of these individuals to cultivate their systematic business knowledge, it seems unrealistic that they would seek to pay the necessary high price for business consulting in the future. An ideal solution would be to build public entrepreneurship clinics to provide these less dynamic and adaptable organizations with free preliminary or in-depth counseling. The Institute of Local Development-Innovation could aim to provide free consulting services to reinforce organizational physiology by coordinating different socioeconomic actors.

Originality/value

To the best of our knowledge, this empirical research is one of the first to test the comprehension of weaker MFs – less competitive and developed in organizational terms – to the triangle crisis–innovation–change management.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Dr Andreas Andrikopoulos, who willingly read the final draft of this text and provided constructive comments. Also, we are grateful to three anonymous reviewers who helped them improve the argument of this research.

Citation

Chatzinikolaou, D. and Vlados, C. (2024), "Crisis, innovation and change management: a blind spot for micro-firms?", Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 698-719. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2022-0210

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles